Arizona Cardinals vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats (Oct 13, 2024)
Quick Stats Summary – Cardinals vs Packers
| Key Stat | Arizona Cardinals | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 13 | 34 |
| Total Yards | 303 | 437 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 1 |
| Time of Possession | 23:25 | 36:35 |
| Third Downs | 4/10 (40%) | 7/12 (58.3%) |
When the Arizona Cardinals visited Lambeau Field on October 13, 2024, they faced a Green Bay Packers team firing on all cylinders. The Arizona Cardinals vs Green Bay Packers match player stats reveal a one-sided affair that dropped the Cardinals to 2-4 while propelling the Packers to 4-2.
Game Overview: October 13, 2024
Venue: Lambeau Field, Green Bay, Wisconsin
Weather: Wet conditions, slippery turf
Attendance: 78,204
Scoring by Quarter
| Quarter | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 0 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 13 |
| Packers | 7 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 34 |
The Packers struck first through Jayden Reed’s 5-yard touchdown reception, ending Arizona’s five-game streak of scoring on opening drives. Green Bay never trailed after that.
Quarterback Stats
Jordan Love delivered a masterclass performance for Green Bay, while Kyler Murray struggled despite avoiding interceptions.
Complete QB Comparison
| Stat Category | Jordan Love (GB) | Kyler Murray (ARI) |
|---|---|---|
| Completions-Attempts | 22-32 | 22-32 |
| Completion % | 68.8% | 68.8% |
| Passing Yards | 258 | 214 |
| Yards/Attempt | 8.1 | 6.7 |
| TD-INT | 4-1 | 1-0 |
| Passer Rating | 119.5 | 97.7 |
| Times Sacked | 0 | 0 |
| Rushing Attempts | 5 | 7 |
| Rushing Yards | 13 | 14 |
| Longest Pass | 44 | 27 |
| Different Receivers | 9 | 6 |
Love’s four touchdown passes tied his career high. His protection remained flawless throughout – the Packers’ offensive line didn’t allow a single sack on 32 dropbacks. His lone interception resulted from Bo Melton slipping on the wet turf rather than poor decision-making.
Murray’s conservative 6.7 yards per attempt and 27-yard longest completion demonstrate how Green Bay’s defense kept everything underneath. His scrambling ability, typically his greatest weapon, produced just 14 yards on seven attempts.
Key Stat: Love distributed passes to nine different receivers compared to Murray’s six, showcasing Green Bay’s offensive versatility.
Rushing Stats
The ground game disparity proved decisive in controlling game tempo and field position.
Team Rushing Comparison
| Category | Green Bay Packers | Arizona Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 179 | 89 |
| Attempts | 38 | 23 |
| Yards/Carry | 4.7 | 3.9 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 0 |
| First Downs | 9 | 5 |
| 10+ Yard Runs | 4 | 1 |
Individual Rushing Performances
| Player | Team | Att | Yards | Avg | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | GB | 18 | 62 | 3.4 | 14 |
| Emanuel Wilson | GB | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 16 |
| Bo Melton | GB | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 16 |
| Jordan Love | GB | 5 | 13 | 2.6 | 6 |
| Trey Benson | ARI | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 20 |
| Emari Demercado | ARI | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 8 |
| James Conner | ARI | 7 | 24 | 3.4 | 9 |
| Kyler Murray | ARI | 7 | 14 | 2.0 | 5 |
Josh Jacobs carried the workload with 18 attempts, wearing down Arizona’s defense. Emanuel Wilson provided explosive plays, averaging 7.7 yards per carry. James Conner, Arizona’s featured back, managed just 24 yards on seven carries – his lowest output of the season.
Receiving Stats
The passing game statistics highlight Green Bay’s balanced attack versus Arizona’s predictable approach.
Complete Receiving Statistics
| Player | Team | Targets | Rec | Yards | Avg | TDs | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey McBride | ARI | 8 | 8 | 96 | 12.0 | 0 | 27 |
| Christian Watson | GB | 4 | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 1 | 44 |
| Romeo Doubs | GB | 4 | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 2 | 20 |
| Emari Demercado | ARI | 7 | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 0 | 13 |
| Greg Dortch | ARI | 5 | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 0 | 16 |
| Jayden Reed | GB | 6 | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 1 | 7 |
| Josh Jacobs | GB | 3 | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 0 | 14 |
| Michael Wilson | ARI | 4 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 1 | 18 |
| Marvin Harrison Jr. | ARI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Critical Context: Marvin Harrison Jr. exited with a concussion in the second quarter after two targets without a catch. His absence forced Murray to rely heavily on tight end Trey McBride, who responded with 8 catches on 8 targets.
Romeo Doubs, returning from a one-game suspension, immediately impacted the game with two touchdown receptions. Christian Watson’s 44-yard touchdown came directly after Keisean Nixon’s 39-yard punt return, a sequence that effectively ended competitive play.
Defensive Stats
Neither team generated a pass rush, but Green Bay’s defense created game-changing turnovers.
Defensive Leaders
| Player | Team | Total | Solo | Ast | TFL | Sacks | FF | FR | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quay Walker | GB | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Krys Barnes | ARI | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Javon Bullard | GB | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edgerrin Cooper | GB | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Budda Baker | ARI | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evan Williams | GB | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Karl Brooks | GB | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Notable Performances:
- Evan Williams earned a 93.3 PFF grade, forcing a crucial fumble
- Karl Brooks both forced and recovered James Conner’s fumble
- Quay Walker’s 11 tackles (10 solo) led all players
Team Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Stat | Cardinals | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| Total Sacks | 0 | 0 |
| QB Hits | 2 | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles Forced | 0 | 3 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 0 | 3 |
Turnover Analysis
Turnovers decided this game, particularly Arizona’s three consecutive fumbles in the second half.
Complete Turnover Timeline
| Time | Team | Player | Type | Game Situation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd Quarter | GB | Bo Melton | INT (Love) | Slipped on route |
| 3rd Quarter | ARI | James Conner | Fumble Lost | After ARI cut lead to 24-13 |
| 3rd Quarter | ARI | Greg Dortch | Fumble Lost | Next possession |
| 3rd Quarter | ARI | Kyler Murray | Fumble Lost | Botched handoff |
Arizona’s fumbles came on three consecutive possessions after they’d shown life by cutting the deficit to 24-13. Karl Brooks and Evan Williams made the key defensive plays for Green Bay.
Penalties and Discipline
Arizona entered as the NFL’s least-penalized team but completely lost composure at Lambeau.
Penalty Breakdown
| Team | Total Penalties | Penalty Yards | Key Infractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 13 | 100 | Multiple defensive holdings |
| Packers | 5 | 40 | 2 false starts |
| Cardinals entered averaging just 3.8 penalties per game | |||
Season Average Comparison:
- Cardinals: 3.8 penalties/game entering Week 6
- Cardinals vs GB: 13 penalties (342% increase)
Sean Murphy-Bunting drew multiple defensive holding calls that extended Packers scoring drives. The penalty disparity provided Green Bay with numerous free first downs and favorable field position.
Special Teams Impact
Special teams provided a crucial momentum swing in the second quarter.
Special Teams Statistics
| Category | Cardinals | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| Punt Return Average | 8.2 | 19.5 |
| Kickoff Return Average | 22.0 | 24.3 |
| Total Punt Returns | 2 for 16 yards | 3 for 59 yards |
| Key Return | None | Nixon 39 yards |
| Field Goals | 2/2 | 2/3 |
| FG Long | 40 | 41 |
| Extra Points | 1/1 | 4/4 |
| Kicker | Chad Ryland | Brayden Narveson |
Field Goal/PAT Performance
| Kicker | Team | FG Made | FG Att | Long | XP Made | XP Att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Ryland | ARI | 2 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 1 |
| Brayden Narveson | GB | 2 | 3 | 41 | 4 | 4 |
Narveson: Made 36, 41 | Missed 44
Ryland: Made 38, 40
Ryland: Made 38, 40
The Game-Changing Sequence: Jayden Reed muffed a punt that Arizona recovered, but offsetting penalties negated the turnover. On the re-kick, Keisean Nixon returned it 39 yards (career-long), setting up Christian Watson’s 44-yard touchdown on the next play.
Situational Football
Success on third downs and in the red zone separated these teams.
| Situation | Packers | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd Down Conversions | 7/12 (58.3%) | 4/10 (40.0%) |
| 3rd & Short (1-3) | 3/3 | 2/3 |
| 3rd & Medium (4-7) | 3/5 | 1/3 |
| 3rd & Long (8+) | 1/4 | 1/4 |
| Red Zone TDs | 2/4 (50%) | 1/3 (33.3%) |
| Total First Downs | 27 | 16 |
Historical Perspective
This game continues recent trends in the Cardinals-Packers rivalry.
Recent Matchup History
| Date | Winner | Score | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2024 | Packers | 34-13 | Green Bay |
| Oct 28, 2021 | Packers | 24-21 | Arizona |
| Jan 16, 2016 | Cardinals | 26-20 (OT) | Arizona (Playoffs) |
| Jan 10, 2010 | Cardinals | 51-45 (OT) | Arizona (Playoffs) |
Green Bay has now won 4 of the last 5 meetings. For more context on Arizona’s struggles against top competition, see our analysis of Arizona Cardinals vs 49ers match player stats.
Coaching Analysis
Matt LaFleur (Green Bay): His “complementary football” philosophy worked perfectly. Offense controlled clock, defense forced turnovers, special teams flipped field position.
Jonathan Gannon (Arizona): Called the performance “uncharacteristic” and admitted it wasn’t “smart enough” to compete. The 13 penalties and three fumbles validate his harsh assessment.
Impact Players
Game MVP: Jordan Love
- 4 passing TDs (career-high tie)
- Zero sacks taken
- 119.5 passer rating
- Distributed to 9 receivers
Unsung Heroes:
- Evan Williams (GB): Forced fumble, 93.3 PFF grade
- Keisean Nixon (GB): 39-yard punt return sparked 7 points
- Trey McBride (ARI): Perfect 8/8 receiving in losing effort
Key Takeaways
The Packers vs Cardinals player statistics confirm Green Bay’s complete control of this game:
| 1 | Offensive Line Supremacy: Zero sacks allowed gave Love time to dissect Arizona’s secondary |
| 2 | Ball Security Disaster: Three second-half fumbles on consecutive drives ended any comeback hopes |
| 3 | Clock Control: Green Bay’s 13+ minute possession advantage kept Arizona’s offense cold |
| 4 | Penalty Implosion: 13 flags for 100 yards from the NFL’s least-penalized team entering Week 6 |
| 5 | Balanced Attack: Nine different Packers caught passes; Cardinals relied too heavily on McBride |
| 6 | Special Teams Momentum: Nixon’s punt return directly led to a backbreaking touchdown |
For additional context on Green Bay’s recent success, check our Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers match player stats breakdown.
Looking Ahead
Green Bay (4-2): Building momentum with complementary football. Love’s development and offensive line play suggest sustainable success.
Arizona (2-4): Haven’t won consecutive games since 2021. Must address ball security and find receiving depth beyond McBride.
According to NFL.com’s official statistics, this marks Arizona’s worst turnover performance of the season. The Pro Football Reference game log confirms Green Bay’s dominance in nearly every statistical category.
| Frequently Asked Questions |
|---|
| What was the final score of the Cardinals vs Packers game on October 13, 2024? |
| Green Bay defeated Arizona 34-13 at Lambeau Field, with the Packers leading 24-10 at halftime. |
| How many touchdown passes did Jordan Love throw against the Cardinals? |
| Love threw 4 touchdown passes to 4 different receivers (Reed, Doubs x2, Watson), tying his career high. |
| Why did Marvin Harrison Jr. not record any stats? |
| The rookie receiver left in the second quarter with a concussion after being targeted twice without a reception. |
| Which Cardinals players fumbled in the game? |
| James Conner, Greg Dortch, and Kyler Murray each lost fumbles on consecutive second-half possessions. |
| Who forced the turnovers for Green Bay? |
| Karl Brooks forced and recovered Conner’s fumble. Evan Williams (93.3 PFF grade) forced Dortch’s fumble, recovered by Jaire Alexander. |
| How many penalties did Arizona commit? |
| The Cardinals were flagged 13 times for 100 yards, compared to their season average of 3.8 penalties per game. |
| What was the time of possession difference? |
| Green Bay controlled the ball for 36:35 compared to Arizona’s 23:25, a difference of 13 minutes and 10 seconds. |
| How did the teams perform on third down? |
| Packers converted 7 of 12 attempts (58.3%) while the Cardinals managed just 4 of 10 (40.0%). |
The Arizona Cardinals vs Green Bay Packers match player stats from October 13, 2024, document a game where one team executed its game plan flawlessly while the other collapsed through self-inflicted mistakes. Green Bay’s comprehensive victory showcased why they’re trending upward while Arizona continues searching for consistency.
Last updated: July 2, 2025. Stats via NFL Game Center, ESPN, and Pro Football Reference.
