Cincinnati Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats (Nov 7, 2024)
The Bengals and Ravens delivered another chapter in their AFC North rivalry on November 7, 2024, with Baltimore escaping 35-34 at M&T Bank Stadium. The Thursday Night Football broadcast on Prime Video captured 71,439 fans experiencing a fourth quarter that produced 34 points and ended with one of the season’s most controversial finishes. Referee Clete Blakeman’s crew made the final call that decided this instant classic.
Table of Contents
Quick Stats Summary
CIN 34
vs
BAL 35
Date
November 7, 2024
Venue
M&T Bank Stadium, Baltimore
Ja’Marr Chase (CIN)
11 catches, 264 yards, 3 TDs
Lamar Jackson (BAL)
25/33, 290 yards, 4 TDs, 141.4 rating
Joe Burrow (CIN)
34/56, 428 yards, 4 TDs, 108.3 rating
Tylan Wallace (BAL)
3 catches, 115 yards, 1 TD
Game Changers: Three Plays That Decided Everything
The Fumble (3rd Quarter, 7:05): Cincinnati led 21-7 with possession at Baltimore’s 31-yard line. Chase Brown fumbled the ball, which was recovered by Roquan Smith at the 31. Baltimore capitalized immediately, scoring five plays later to cut the deficit to 21-14.
The Wallace Explosion (4th Quarter, 13:30): On 3rd-and-2 from Baltimore’s 16, Jackson connected with Tylan Wallace for an 84-yard touchdown. The score made it 21-20, though Tucker’s missed extra point kept Cincinnati ahead by one.
The Final Play (4th Quarter, 0:38): After Chase’s 5-yard touchdown catch brought Cincinnati within 35-34, Burrow’s two-point attempt to Tanner Hudson fell incomplete. Replays showed apparent defensive holding on Mike Gesicki and contact to Burrow’s helmet, but no penalties were called.
Statistical Breakdown: Fourth Quarter Explosion
| Quarter | Cincinnati | Baltimore | Quarter Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Quarter | 7 | 0 | 7 points |
| 2nd Quarter | 7 | 7 | 14 points |
| 3rd Quarter | 7 | 7 | 14 points |
| 4th Quarter | 13 | 21 | 34 points |
| Final | 34 | 35 | 69 points |
The final 15 minutes produced nearly half the game’s total points. Baltimore scored on three consecutive possessions in the fourth quarter, covering 92, 65, and 70 yards.
How Did Both Quarterbacks Perform?
| Quarterback | Comp/Att | Yards | TD | INT | Rating | Sacks | QB Hits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joe Burrow
CIN
|
34/56 | 428 | 4 | 0 | 108.3 | 3 | 13 |
|
Lamar Jackson
BAL
|
25/33 | 290 | 4 | 0 | 141.4 | 0 | 1 |
Burrow faced pressure on 40 dropbacks, tied for the most any quarterback faced in a single game during the 2024 season. Despite the constant pressure, he managed to complete 34 passes for 428 yards without throwing an interception.
Jackson’s protection remained pristine throughout. Cincinnati’s defensive front managed zero sacks and just one QB hit across 33 passing attempts. His fourth-quarter efficiency reached elite levels: 12 completions on 14 attempts for 205 yards and three touchdowns.
Which Receivers Dominated the Game?
| Player | Team | Rec | Targets | Yards | TD | Y/C | Long | Key Moment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja’Marr Chase | CIN | 11 | 17 | 264 | 3 | 24.0 | 70 | 70-yd TD (Q4, 5:37) |
| Tylan Wallace | BAL | 3 | 3 | 115 | 1 | 38.3 | 84 | 84-yd TD (Q4, 13:30) |
| Chase Brown | CIN | 9 | 11 | 52 | 0 | 5.8 | 17 | Q3 fumble |
| Mark Andrews | BAL | 6 | 7 | 68 | 1 | 11.3 | 18 | 18-yd go-ahead TD |
| Tanner Hudson | CIN | 6 | 7 | 42 | 1 | 7.0 | 10 | Failed 2-PT target |
| Rashod Bateman | BAL | 6 | 8 | 54 | 1 | 9.0 | 15 | Game-winning TD |
| Mike Gesicki | CIN | 4 | 9 | 30 | 0 | 7.5 | 13 | 9 targets, limited production |
Chase’s 264 yards against Baltimore brings his 2024 season total against the Ravens to 457 yards and five touchdowns in two games, an NFL record for most receiving yards against one opponent in a single season. His 62% share of Cincinnati’s passing yards marks one of the highest single-game percentages in 2024.
Stat Spotlight: Critical Numbers
40
Pressures generated by Baltimore’s defense on Joe Burrow
0
Sacks recorded by Cincinnati’s defense on Lamar Jackson
11-3
Penalty count disadvantage for Cincinnati (81 yards vs 23 yards)
99
Baltimore’s rushing yards, ending their 42-game streak of 100+ yards
5
Offensive snaps for Tylan Wallace, who produced 115 yards
Ground Game Production
| Player | Team | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Fumbles Lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | BAL | 16 | 68 | 4.3 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Chase Brown | CIN | 13 | 42 | 3.2 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
| Lamar Jackson | BAL | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Joe Burrow | CIN | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Baltimore’s historic rushing streak ended in unusual fashion. Jackson’s final kneel down lost one yard, dropping their total to 99 yards after 42 consecutive games with 100 or more.
How Did the Defenses Match Up?
Pass Rush Statistics
| Team | Sacks | QB Pressures | TFL | QB Hits | Forced Fumbles | Fumbles Recovered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore | 3 | 40 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| Cincinnati | 0 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Defensive Leaders
| Player | Team | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | Pass Breakups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roquan Smith | BAL | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Germaine Pratt | CIN | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Wilson | CIN | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Jordan Battle | CIN | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trenton Simpson | BAL | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nnamdi Madubuike | BAL | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Madubuike’s three sacks came at crucial moments, including one late in the second quarter that forced a Cincinnati punt and another in the third quarter that pushed the Bengals out of field goal range.
Why Did Penalties Matter So Much?
| Category | Cincinnati | Baltimore |
|---|---|---|
| Total Penalties | 11 | 3 |
| Penalty Yards | 81 | 23 |
| First Downs by Penalty | 1 | 4 |
| Defensive Holding Calls | 2 | 1 |
| False Starts | 0 | 3 |
Cincinnati’s penalty troubles included a crucial offensive holding call on center Ted Karras that negated a seven-yard run and put them in 1st-and-20. Baltimore committed just three penalties all night, with two being pre-snap false starts that had minimal impact.
Special Teams Impact
| Category | Cincinnati | Baltimore |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goals Made/Attempted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Extra Points Made/Attempted | 4/4 (McPherson) | 3/4 (Tucker) |
| Punts (Average) | 3 (41.3 yards) | 5 (46.2 yards) |
| Punt Return Average | -2.0 (Irwin) | 0.0 |
| Kickoff Return Average | 17.0 (Burton) | 30.0 (Mitchell) |
Justin Tucker, typically one of the NFL’s most reliable kickers, missed the extra point following Wallace’s touchdown, a rare miscue that kept the score at 21-20 instead of tying the game.
Two-Point Conversion Breakdown
| Team | Attempts | Successful | Play Description | Score After |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore | 1 | 1 | Jackson run left end | BAL 28-21 |
| Cincinnati | 1 | 0 | Burrow pass to Hudson incomplete | BAL 35-34 |
Former NFL referee Terry McAulay reviewed the final two-point attempt on the broadcast and identified two missed penalties: defensive holding on Mike Gesicki and illegal contact to Burrow’s helmet.
What Were the Key Third and Fourth Down Stats?
| Team | 3rd Down Conv. | 3rd Down % | 4th Down Conv. | 4th Down % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati | 8/16 | 50.0% | 2/4 | 50.0% |
| Baltimore | 7/12 | 58.3% | 0/0 | N/A |
Cincinnati’s 4th-and-2 from Baltimore’s 34-yard line proved pivotal. Rather than attempting a short pass or run, Burrow launched deep to Jermaine Burton. The incompletion gave Baltimore possession with excellent field position, leading directly to their go-ahead touchdown.
Red Zone Efficiency
| Team | Red Zone Trips | Touchdowns | Red Zone TD % | Points from Red Zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati | 3 | 3 | 100% | 21 |
| Baltimore | 4 | 4 | 100% | 28 |
Perfect red zone execution by both teams meant the game came down to which offense could create more opportunities. Baltimore’s extra trip proved decisive.
Complete Team Statistics
| Statistical Category | Cincinnati | Baltimore |
|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 75 | 58 |
| Total Yards | 470 | 389 |
| Yards Per Play | 6.3 | 6.7 |
| First Downs | 27 | 20 |
| Passing First Downs | 21 | 14 |
| Rushing First Downs | 2 | 5 |
| Penalty First Downs | 1 | 4 |
| Time of Possession | 31:35 | 28:25 |
| Total Drives | 11 | 12 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
Individual Impact Players
Tylan Wallace (BAL): The reserve receiver produced 115 yards on just three catches. His 84-yard touchdown came on just his third target while playing only five offensive snaps. He caught all three passes thrown his way.
Chase Brown (CIN): The running back compiled 94 yards from scrimmage and scored Cincinnati’s first touchdown. His fumble at Baltimore’s 31-yard line while leading 21-7 became the game’s only turnover.
Nnamdi Madubuike (BAL): The defensive tackle recorded three of Baltimore’s 40 pressures as official sacks. His seven individual pressures constantly disrupted Cincinnati’s offensive rhythm.
Roquan Smith (BAL): The linebacker’s fumble recovery set up Baltimore’s comeback. His 12 tackles led all defenders and included several key stops on third down.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How many yards did Ja’Marr Chase have against the Ravens?
A: Chase recorded 264 receiving yards on 11 catches with three touchdowns. Combined with his earlier 2024 game against Baltimore, he totaled 457 yards against them this season.
Q: Did Cincinnati sack Lamar Jackson at all?
A: No, the Bengals defense failed to record a single sack and managed just one QB hit on Jackson across his 33 pass attempts.
Q: What penalties were missed on the final play?
A: Television replay analyst and former NFL referee Terry McAulay identified defensive holding on Mike Gesicki and illegal contact to Joe Burrow’s helmet that weren’t called.
Q: How many penalties did each team commit?
A: Cincinnati was penalized 11 times for 81 yards while Baltimore had just 3 penalties for 23 yards.
Q: Did Baltimore extend their 100-yard rushing streak?
A: No, the Ravens finished with 99 rushing yards, ending their 42-game streak when Jackson’s final kneel down lost a yard.
Fantasy Football and Betting Angles
Ja’Marr Chase posted 44.4 PPR fantasy points, the ninth-highest single-game total by a receiver in NFL history. His two-game 2024 total against Baltimore (457 yards, 5 TDs) makes him an automatic start in any future matchups.
The penalty differential (11-3) and turnover margin (1-0 Baltimore) aligned with the final result. Teams that lose the turnover battle while committing double-digit penalties rarely win in the NFL.
The game total of 69 points made this one of the higher-scoring affairs of Week 10. Baltimore’s fourth-quarter execution proved the difference in this one-point victory.
Playoff Race Implications
Baltimore’s victory pushed them to 7-3, maintaining control of the AFC North. They improved to 4-1 in games decided by seven points or fewer, demonstrating the clutch gene required for January football.
Cincinnati fell to 4-6, needing to win most of their remaining games to secure a wild-card spot. Their 1-4 record in one-score games highlights their inability to close out tight contests, a concerning trend for a team with playoff aspirations.
Historical Context
For additional perspective on these teams’ seasons, Baltimore’s ability to generate pressure mirrors their earlier success against Kansas City. Cincinnati’s pass protection issues echo problems from their previous meeting with the Chiefs, suggesting a pattern opposing defenses continue to exploit.
The Significance of This Result
Baltimore’s 35-34 victory showcased their championship DNA through several measurable factors. Their defense generated pressure at a historic rate (40 pressures), their discipline showed through minimal penalties (just three), and their quarterback delivered when the game demanded it most (perfect 158.3 fourth-quarter passer rating).
Cincinnati demonstrated elite offensive capability through Burrow’s 428 passing yards and Chase’s record-setting performance. Yet their 11 penalties, inability to generate any pass rush, and the costly fumble at a crucial moment revealed the gaps between good teams and great ones.
The 71,439 fans at M&T Bank Stadium witnessed statistical anomalies throughout: a team winning despite being outgained by 81 yards, a kicker missing an extra point who rarely misses anything, and a 42-game streak ending by a single yard. These oddities make Ravens versus Bengals matchups appointment viewing for NFL fans.
Burrow and Chase connected 11 times for 264 yards, yet Cincinnati lost. Jackson threw for 131 fewer yards than Burrow, yet Baltimore won. The penalty yards (81-23), pressure differential (40-8), and clutch fourth-quarter scoring (21-13 Baltimore) determined the outcome more than total yardage or time of possession.
This AFC North rivalry continues producing games decided by the smallest margins. Their last five meetings have been decided by a combined 11 points. Each team knows the other’s tendencies, yet games still come down to execution in crucial moments. Baltimore executed when necessary. Cincinnati, despite their statistical advantages, did not.
Sources: CBS Sports Game Tracker, Pro Football Reference, NFL.com Game Center
